Likeability and quality of care

Likeability and quality of care

Does your doctor like you? Does it matter? Well, it may influence the quality of care you receive.

A new study indicates that there could be a correlation between how much your doctor likes you and how seriously your pain symptoms are taken.

The research was conducted by researchers from the University of Ghent in Belgium and Dr. Ken Prkachin, from the University of Northern BC in Canada and was published in the latest volume of the journal Pain. Dr. Prkachin studies, among other things, pain expression and clinical psychology.

The study used photos and descriptions of personality traits to build up personas which were positive, neutral, or negative. Then videos were shown to observers who were asked to gauge the amount of pain the patient was experiencing. The results contributed to the teamGÃÍs theory that most people underestimate pain in someone they dislike, health professionals reduce its severity even further.

This is the opposite result than one might expect, where good clinical judgment and more experience should allow physicians to gauge pain more accurately.

“A good case can be made … that is going to demoralize patients and contribute to very testy patient-professional relationships,” Prkachin said. “What we’re trying to do is understand what’s going on there and how to change that.”– CTV News

Add this to the body of evidence that shows attractive people get preferential treatment and are perceived more positively through the “halo effect” in our psychology. Also add the studies that show the “big five” personality traits have effects on personal and professional success and you are left with a complex picture of the social dynamics at play during a patient / physician consult.

Update Oct 14, 2011

I reached out to Dr. Ken Prkachin to get his input on whether there was enough evidence to draw the conclusion that healthcare professionals (all of them, not just physicians) are affected by this “likeability” bias. Our email exchange resulted in the following clarifications:

  1. This study was conducted on non-HCPs
  2. There is independent evidence that even HCPs are affected by the “likeability” bias
  3. There is also some evidence that over exposure makes HCPs less sensitive to patients’ pain
So, while the study was not conducted directly on HCPs I think the implications are that they are affected, perhaps strongly, and our recommendations are valid.

So, what does this mean for today’s e-Patients?

An e-patient has a fine line to navigate with their different healthcare providers. As an educated and knowledgeable contributor to the process the e-patient must bring forward what he or she knows, but it seems that it is important to do it in a collaborative and, for lack of a better term, friendly way.

Knowing this, how can e-patients improve their outcomes during those precious 5-15 minutes with the physician? Nancy Finn has some ideas on the e-Patient blog, and we can probably provide some general guidance:

Be pleasant

Every e-patient’s condition is important, and each has an entire life entangled with it. Remember that the healthcare partners see something on the order of 300-500 patients every week. That doesn’t make each e-patient any less important, any less valuable, but it does give some insight into what the HCPs deal with every day. As the study at the beginning of this post shows, a smile and a friendly demeanor can go a long way to extracting the best care from the system.

Be prepared

This often means keeping a symptom journal or using some other tool to help you remember and communicate your progress (or lack thereof) efficiently. Charts and summaries are good, endless pages of notes aren’t. These tools are often available on association websites, condition-focused websites, or even branded pharmaceutical therapy websites.

Stay open

It is easy for an engaged e-patient to dwell on problems and issues between physician consults, and to over-analyze the conversations. This is a trap to avoid, especially when you need to see the same physician many times and are having a hard time convincing him or her of your ability to accurately present your condition.

Listen as much as you talk

To be most effective the e-patient / physician partnership needs to be balanced. Typically the problems are seen to be unbalanced toward the physician, but e-patients need to assume responsibility and listen to what is being said and really consider the information before responding. Present your thoughts and opinions with the conviction that your own research has developed, but don’t be afraid to get the details and learn something new.

If necessary, take a stand

Sometimes, when you accurately present your condition, show your research, and provide your opinions physicians will still simply not agree. Sometimes they will be right, sometimes wrong, usually it will be impossible to tell until later when the e-patient has overcome the disease. An e-patient always has the right to take a stand, decide, and inform your healthcare partners what you want to do. They may not be able to help you, but in most cases professional standards will require them to point you in the direction of someone who can.

But before you get here, make sure you’ve at least tried to work the system.

What are your suggestions on how e-patients should deal with the medical systems and physicians to get the best benefit?

Brad Einarsen, Director, Digital Insight

Brad is Klick's Director of Digital Insight, supporting our Strategy, Accounts, and New Business groups to gather, disseminate, and make accessible knowledge about our clients, their products, and the markets in which they operate.
  • http://www.mightycasey.com MightyCasey

    Great advice. As much as patients like to b***h about some doctors treating us like meat puppets, it’s always good to remember that we are all human first. THEN we’re patients/clinicians. That old Golden Rule holds in the healthcare transaction as much, if not more, than it does in the rest of our interactions with our fellow beings.

    Be prepared, communicate clearly, ask questions, work to understand the answers, and surrender to the process when a treatment plan has been developed. Lather, rinse, repeat.

    And always remember each other’s humanity.

    • Anonymous

      MightyCasey, I like your process of “surrender to the process” once you have a treatment plan. If you don’t execute the plan with mindfulness and dedication it has a lower chance of success! Thanks for that.

      • http://www.mightycasey.com MightyCasey

        That’s the boiled-down-to-an-essence message of my book: assemble your medical team by asking questions + working to understand the answers, then build the treatment plan and surrender to the process. I recommend that patients behave like customers, in the sense that they participate in and guide the outcome goals of that process.

        Ultimately, though, you’ve gotta just get in the boat and embark on the voyage. Make sure you’ve got a 24-hour watch, too ;)

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1290278788 Mark S. King

    I had heard that more attractive people are favored in society, but it never occurred to me that likeability could affect our help care. And thanks for the practical tips for doctor visits. I’m going to repost this on my site.

    Mark S. King
    MyFabulousDisease.com

    • Anonymous

      Thanks, Mark. I find that these techniques work with “allied healthcare” too. One of my daughters has Autism and my wife has become a champion of using these techniques when dealing with intake workers, teachers, case review boards, etc.

      It also helps that my daughter has an exceptionally sweet heart, everyone she meets wants to help her.

  • http://www.YDMV.net Bennet

    This seems to be jumping to some conclusions that the underlying paper does not support. That is that physicians may respond to pain based on appearance or like ability.

    The paper in Pain appears to be a study of layperson responses based on appearance. The study it self says, “There are some limitations to this study. First, as in most vignette studies on this topic and, observers were laypeople. One should therefore be cautious in generalizing results toward professional caregivers” (1).

    I was able to access to the actual article through the library of my masters program. As a layperson it would have cost me thirty odd bucks to read. More that I want to spend on a fast fact check of a blog post. So form me the ePatient lesson is about access to information and drawing conclusions form article abstracts.

    In part this blog post advocates a relationship of mutual respect between patient at physician. As patents we need to be careful to be informed. That includes being a little critical of sources that may create or reinforce disrespectful stereotypes of caregivers. Maybe the larger picture is simply being cautious of stereotypes of any kind and as is advocated in the post be pleasant, prepared and participate (2).

    (1) Lies De Ruddere, Liesbet Goubert, Ken Martin Prkachin, Michael Andr+¼ Louis Stevens, Dimitri Marcel Leon Van Ryckeghem, Geert Crombez, When you dislike patients, pain is taken less seriously, PAIN, Volume 152, Issue 10, October 2011, Pages 2342-2347, ISSN 0304-3959, 10.1016/j.pain.2011.06.028.
    (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304395911004313)
    Keywords: Observers; Pain estimation; Pain expression; PatientsGÃÍ likability

    (2) Props to Mark King’s happy, hopeful, handful

    • Anonymous

      Bennet, thanks for looking at the source paper directly and your thoughtful analysis.

      Dr. Ken Prkachin is the one who draws the conclusion that “likeability” can influence physicians’ perception of pain. He says in the CTV interview that, if anything, overexposure can make them more likely to exhibit this trait.

      CTV Interview:
      http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Health/20111012/doctors-underestimate-pain-patients-111012/

      His CV tends to concentrate on patients and pain expression:
      http://web.unbc.ca/~kmprk/cv.html

      So, thanks again for the review! While the study subjects are not physicians I suspect that Dr. Prkachin’s quotes are from many studies over many years.

      Of course, he is one researcher, and they have biases too! So, like you say we need to be cautious of stereotypes. That’s great advice. Thanks again for your comment.

    • http://reknow.com Brad Einarsen

      Updated post

      I reached out to Dr. Prkachin and got his thoughts on this study and his experience with pain and the patient / physician relationship. Added the outcome to the post.

  • Anonymous

    I like Nancy’s “5 steps to Improving Patient Like-ability & Quality of Care”. Not enough patients practice these steps. We must hold ourselves to the same rules we do our physicians. How can we expect them to remember every detail of our healthcare journey if we can’t even remember when a symptom happened and where it occurred!

    It’s going to be tough to encourage patients to become more empowered, but they must evolve or also point the finger at themselves for their lack of progress.